Clapp Peterson Tiemessen Thorsness LLC

Call us for a consultation

ANCHORAGE OFFICE:
907-885-0571

FAIRBANKS OFFICE:
907-885-3467

  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Michael Cohn
    • John J. Tiemessen
    • Constance C. Ringstad
    • Megan E. Edlund
    • Joe C. Martin
    • In Memory of John Thorsness
  • Practice Areas
    • Political Practice
    • Products Liability
    • Professional Liability
    • Real Estate Agent Liability
  • In The News
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Michael Cohn
    • John J. Tiemessen
    • Constance C. Ringstad
    • Megan E. Edlund
    • Joe C. Martin
    • In Memory of John Thorsness
  • Practice Areas
    • Political Practice
    • Products Liability
    • Professional Liability
    • Real Estate Agent Liability
  • In The News
  • Blog
  • Contact
Clapp Peterson Tiemessen Thorsness & Johnson LLC
 907-885-0571

 907-885-3467

Effective And Efficient Legal Services

Businesses can protect themselves with non-competes

by Clapp, Peterson, Tiemessen, Thorsness LLC | Jun 14, 2021 | Employment Law |

It’s standard for middle to large businesses to include a non-compete agreement in an employee’s exit package or onboarding. The goal is to restrict competitors from hiring former employees who have proprietary information or trade secrets. While it is seemingly at odds with the employee’s right to earn a living, a well-drafted non-compete can help protect a business’s interests.

Not all conditions are enforceable

A poorly worded agreement will probably not hold up in court, which makes it useless. So it is essential for companies to zero in on valid business issues as the basis for a binding contract. Circumstances will vary by company, but successful agreements often focus on:

  • Trade secrets involving proprietary practices, products and services
  • Use of special training provided by the employer
  • Proprietary information that is not a trade secret

    It’s best to be reasonable

Contracts that are not overly restrictive in scope, territory or length have the best chance of standing up in court. Clients may not realize how much business practices change and update over time, so they should feel minimize their discomfort with a short sunset to the agreement (a few years is often viable). Geographic concerns may be unique here in Alaska, but former employers should avoid overly broad range that is outside the state or the worker’s territory. Depending on the business and competition in the state, the client should limit their scope to direct competitors.

Different jobs will have different restrictions

Those with questions can discuss the specifics of a situation with an attorney who handles these kinds of contracts. But overall, a good rule of thumb is to protect the company rather than punish the employee for leaving.

Recent Posts

  • Top 5 reasons nurses face license issues and how to avoid them
  • Steps to take after a legal malpractice accusation
  • Alaska high court overturns medical malpractice limits
  • What does Alaska require when it comes to meal and rest breaks?
  • Defending against claims of attorney-client privilege violations

Archives

Categories

  • Employment Law
  • Firm News
  • Licensure Defense
  • Professional Malpractice

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Contact Us Today

Clapp Peterson Tiemessen Thorsness LLC

Contact Us



Anchorage Law Office

711 H Street
Suite 320
Anchorage, AK 99501

907-885-0571

Anchorage Office


Fairbanks Law Office

411 Fourth Avenue
Suite 300
Fairbanks, AK 99701

907-272-9586

Fairbanks Office
  • Follow
  • Follow
Review Us

© 2025 Clapp, Peterson, Tiemessen, Thorsness LLC • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw